Review: Minari

Amidst the Oscar-related acclaim for Lee Isaac Chung’s semi-autobiographical feature there was an online interview with Best Supporting Actress nominee Youn Yuh-jung, who expressed bewilderment at the strong emotional reaction that many Korean-Americans had toward the film. Having herself emigrated to the U.S. when she was young, she understood the hardships that the fictional family in the film endured, but as someone who was born in Korea she said immigrants her age didn’t expect to have access to the American Dream. Korean-Americans, meaning people of Korean ethnicity who were born in the U.S., were steeped in that mindset.

Youn’s insightful take on the film’s effect reflect something of Chung’s own reticence to over-dramatize what happens to the Yee family, who move from Los Angeles to the rustic town of Lincoln, Arkansas, to start a farm where they will grow vegetables for local Koreans. The film is set in the 1980s. Jacob (Steven Yeun) and Monica (Yeri Han) are South Korean immigrants, while their two children, Anne (Noel Kate Cho) and David (Alan Kim), were born in the U.S. Monica, we soon discern, is not that crazy about the move, since she and Jacob had relatively good factory jobs in SoCal. Jacob takes the American Dream at face value, which is why he believes he can make something of himself on his own, but Chung, obviously remembering his own father, who did pretty much the same thing when Chung was David’s age, presents Jacob as headstrong in the worst way: Dismissive of his wife’s concerns and over-confident of his own abilities to tame the land. Two scenes clearly show that his dream was not properly thought out. When the family arrives at the farm they have taken over with their life savings—and which came cheap because the previous tenant committed suicide—Monica is shocked that the house is a mobile home on blocks with dodgy water pressure and crappy wallpaper. Later, when Jacob is looking to dig a well in order to avoid the high cost of buying public water for irrigation, he dismisses the professional water diviner, thinking that his own common sense (look for where the land dips down) will save him a lot of money. 

Jacob is thus the movie’s immovable force, but Chung pointedly avoids making him either the devil or a fool. He mostly ignores how his attitudes affect his family, and his relationship with Monica is always chilly. He understands his responsibilities, but also thinks that only he can make things right. Consequently, he asks Monica’s mother, Soonja (Youn) to move in with them, ostensibly to watch the kids because Jacob and Monica still have to make cash by sexing chicks at a local poultry farm. Soonja, it’s implied, has come straight from Seoul, where she seems to have lived fairly well and cultivated a saucy, unkempt attitude. Her casual obscenities, even in front of her grandchildren, lend the film a welcome element of comic relief, especially given the air of seriousness surrounding the Yees’ marriage and David’s struggles to construct an identity in a place that automatically sees him as an outsider.

Chung takes an episodic approach to the story, whose dramatic arc is perhaps too subtle for it to be as effective as he likes: The ending’s power has more to do with how unexpected it is than anything else. This measured restraint has its good points, the main one being how naturalistic and credible the Yees’ relationship with their white neighbors is; but also its weaknesses, the main one being that the stakes are never fully articulated. And therein, perhaps, lies the difference that Youn was trying to explain in interviews. As a white American (and one who has lived as a white American in Japan for half his life), I can’t hope to make the immediate emotional connections that are so meaningful to Korean-Americans, who come to the film with expectations born of experience. Which probably means I should see it again. 

In Korean and English. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Chanter Hibiya (050-6868-5001), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024), Toho Cinemas Shibuya (050-6868-5002).

Minari home page in Japanese

photo (c) Melissa Lukenbaugh, A24

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Merle file

Occasionally, I go through old published reviews of mine from the 90s and 00s and post them here. I came upon one that I did under the alias Merle Pangloss, a parody persona used for reviewing certain types of rock concerts whose purpose is quickly discernible and hardly original, but I’ve decided to post links to the ones that are still online. There were other Merle missives from the 90s that are not online but somewhere in my files. I’ll try to dig them out and get them up. Enjoy.

Limp Bizkit

Green Day

Oasis

“School of Rock”

Posted in Music | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Media Mix, March 14, 2021

Here’s this week’s Media Mix about the government’s proposed revision to the immigration law. As pointed out by attorney Shoichi Ibusuki and Eri Ishikawa, who works for an organization that provides support for refugees in Japan, during the discussion of the matter on the TBS radio show “Session,” much of the immigration agency’s work with regard to asylum-seekers is to dehumanize them so that they can’t possibly get a purchase on the public’s sympathies. Ibusuki mentions how the mass media learned about the revision through a justice ministry “lecture,” meaning there was no question-and-answer session. The government told the reporters only as much as they wanted them to know and then the reporters, for the most part, regurgitated this information verbatim. Asahi Shimbun at least had the wherewithal to look at the bill more carefully and betrayed some doubts as to just how much it would solve the problem of indefinite detention, but it was in the context of an editorial, meaning anyone who read it might think that the Asahi itself had an agenda. During the discussion, Ibusuki could barely contain his anger, which was aimed as much at the media as it was at the government. 

And one of the ways the media conspires with the government in this way is not to humanize the issue. These are real people we’re talking about, people whose lives might be in danger, so the issue of “Why did they choose Japan in the first place?” is sort of beside the point. They are here now and if the authorities willfully choose to ignore the situations these people fled then they can’t rightfully claim to be members of that subset of countries who says it respects human rights above all else. In that light, I fell victim to this same pattern of neglect by calling the person who basically sparked the revision “the Nigerian man [who] died in Nagasaki Prefecture after going on a hunger strike to protest his confinement,” rather than his name, which is Gerald Okafor, though many people called him “Sunny.” You can read his story in Dreux Richard’s new book, Every Human Intention. Sunny was not a refugee, but the media’s tacit agreement to not name him is the same tactic the government uses to make asylum seekers disappear. 

Posted in Media | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: The Outpost

The post-Platoon American war movie has been obsessed with verisimilitude; not just in terms of visceral shock, but with the kind of behaviors that battle readiness gives rise to. On the surface, The Outpost comes across as a kind of exploitation flick, with the last half given over to nonstop fighting that places the viewer right in the midst of the carnage, but in other ways the movie is almost strikingly forthright about the pointlessness of the current American attitude toward military effectiveness, especially when it comes to the misguided adventure in Afghanistan, the longest war the U.S. has ever fought. 

Director Rod Lurie doesn’t try to transcend his assignment. Right away he lays out what’s at stake, both strategically for the characters and dramatically for the audience. The titular base is located at the bottom of a basin in the Afghanistan mountains near the Pakistan border. It’s 2009, and already the troops know that they’ve been tasked with the impossible. The script provides us with the usual roster of recruit types, varying in emotional and intellectual range, and what they all seem to have in common is a general disregard for their commanders’ sense that the locals they are supposed to work with against the Taliban will help them in this fight. In any case, the outpost goes through leaders like band-aids. Stretches of boredom are broken by sudden attacks that usually leave at least one American dead. As the word comes in that the outpost will soon be dismantled, the men themselves understand that once the Taliban find out (and they will find out), they’ll attack with everything they’ve got. The intelligence that those in charge haven’t taken this eventuality into full consideration makes the resulting slaughter all the more infuriating.

Though there are no big name stars in the film, there are enough second-level A-actors (Orlando Bloom, Caleb Landry Jones, Scott Eastwood) to make you wonder what the pitch was, and one of the most impressive feats that Lurie pulls off is creating an ensemble dynamic that feels organic. He doesn’t try to highlight heroics and has no use for meaningful dialogue, but rather focuses on the only truism that holds any real substance for these men, which is to survive at any cost. The Outpost isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about war, whether in Afghanistan or elsewhere, but it keeps its eye steady on the prize, which is to show how men hold on to their sanity under impossible circumstances. 

Now playing in Tokyo at Shinjuku Wald 9 (03-5369-4955).

The Outpost home page in Japanese

photo (c) Outpost Productions Inc. 2020

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Interview with Aidan Moffat, Dec. 2006

Arab Strap has reunited and released a new album. Here’s an interview I did with Aidan Moffatt on the occasion of their farewell tour. From the Japan Times.

Pop artists tend to be identified by their musical stylings but some are associated with specific themes. The Scottish duo Arab Strap specialize in alcohol-induced sexual anxiety, characterized by Aidan Moffat’s slurred, sotto voce ramblings about women bedded in a haze of beer and Malcolm Middleton’s delicate, atmospheric guitar work. Over a decade they moved from a kind of ambient electronica to real pop songs with choruses and bridges, and apparently the evolution is complete, since they announced in Sept. that they’re calling it quits. 

“It’s a good idea we end where we sound good instead of continuing to make records that don’t interest anybody,” says Moffat over the phone from Manchester, one of the final stops on their Farewell Tour of Europe. “There are other bands who would benefit from the same thing, but I wouldn’t want to name any of them.”

The breakup has also resulted in the inevitable career retrospective, but “Ten Years of Tears,” a title that pokes fun at the pair’s depressive reputation, isn’t the usual greatest hits collection if only because Arab Strap didn’t have any bona fide hits. “It was going to be a B-sides/rarities compilation,” says Moffat. “Then we decided it would be better to tell a story of how we began and follow through.”

Moffat and Middleton were both 21 and disillusioned with their respective musical projects when they joined forces in their hometown of Falkirk. Calling themselves Arab Strap, the name of a sexual aid, they made some tapes and sent them to local label Chemikal Underground who asked them to send more. Their first single, “The First Big Weekend,” which was written and recorded in an afternoon, earned instant notoriety when it was named by tastemaker John Peel as one of the best songs of 1996 and played every day for months by DJ Steve Lamacq on Radio 1. 

“To this day I don’t understand why people like it so much,” says Moffat. The song is a monologue about what he did the previous weekend and set the pattern for his uncomfortably personal lyrics, which were sometimes described as being misanthropic or even misogynistic. Close listening reveals a romantic at heart, albeit a brutally honest one. Over time, sexual malaise gave way to thoughtful meditations on the meaning of commitment and the elusiveness of connubial happiness. In addition, the music itself became more evocative. The tunes on their last proper album, “The Last Romance,” are almost upbeat. 

“We were getting stuck in a formulaic Arab Strap sound,” Moffat says. “‘There Is No Ending,’ which ends ‘The Last Romance’ and the compilation was released as a 7-inch single and I read a review that said, ‘Typical of Arab Strap, they release their most commercial single on the eve of their destruction.'”

Moffat has already started a solo career under the name L. Pierre. “It’s instrumentals made up of old record samples that I found, almost easy listening type of stuff, though by the time I’m finished with them they may not be that easy to listen to.” He’s also working on a spoken word project in which “every track is a minute long, and there’s like thirty tracks, so you get this half-hour story and there’s a booklet that you read while listening or it doesn’t make any sense.”

Given his distinctive narrative style, has he ever considered just writing for the page? “It’s something I want to pursue, but writing takes up an incredible amount of time. People who write for a living have to get up at eight o’clock in the morning.”

The farewell tour is supposed to end in their home base of Glasgow, where they are central to that city’s internationally-recognized music scene. (Belle and Sebastian’s “The Boy With the Arab Strap” was written about Moffat) It sold out a long time ago. However, it won’t be the last dates they play.

“The Japanese tour is a secret tour,” he says, and adds with a raspy laugh, “at least as far as the Western world is concerned. It wasn’t finalized until after the Glasgow date was advertised as our final show ever. I don’t want people to get pissed off, so I don’t see why they need to know.”

Posted in Music | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Media Mix, March 7, 2021

Kawamura/Omura

Here’s this week’s Media Mix about the ignominious end of the petition drive to recall Aichi Prefecture Governor Hideaki Omura. Though I purposely played down the ideological forces at play in this drama, it mostly came down to what one observer called ineptitude in the service of blind rage. Famous plastic surgeon Katsuya Takasu was the public face of the recall campaign, and he’s an equally famous right wing firebrand who was deeply offended by that section in the 2019 Aichi Triennale art show that featured things like the comfort woman statue and some burnt photo of the emperor. Omura had nothing to do with the selection of these exhibits. He was simply a figurehead, someone who was named the head of the Triennale for ceremonial purposes, but since he didn’t support the closing of the exhibit (it closed due to threats from anonymous persons) he was demonized by Takasu and Takashi Kawamura, the mayor of Nagoya, where the exhibit was held. Kawamura is not so much right wing as totally self-serving, and he’s had a beef with Omura ever since the governor declined to support his pet project, rebuilding Nagoya Castle completely in wood. There were other more minor right wing personages behind the petition drive, but these two are the ones with the name value, so they pretty much have to carry the burden of the ignominy after 80 percent of the names on the petitions were found to be forged. It may be months before the results of a police investigation into the matter see light, but the general feeling I got from reading the coverage in Litera and conversations about the matter on the internet is that there was never enough public support behind the recall and perhaps the authors of the petition knew that. What they mainly wanted was to keep their resentment of the Triennale and Omura’s lack of support in the public’s consciousness. So the question is: When did it turn from a desperate PR ploy into a desperate face-saving gambit? Even Makoto Sakurai, one of the most rabid right-wingers in Japan, commented that the forgeries seemed to indicate that the people behind the recall had been carried away and in the process lost all sense of proportion. How to explain the utterly foolish idea of setting up an operation to forge petitions that would be impossible to hide? Media are calling the Chunichi Shimbun and Nishinippon Shimbun stories about the petition mill scoops, but from what I gather the information was just there in plain sight for anyone to discover. It’s tempting to characterize this stupidity as a side effect of the uncompromising hatred that many ultra-conservatives trade in, and not just in Japan. It just shows what can happen when that hatred gets out of hand. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Review: Baseball Girl

The implied purpose of Choi Yun-tae’s Baseball Girl is to upend all the cliches attached to sports movies while at the same time following them to the letter. Thematically, Choi wants to show as honestly as possible the obstacles that women face when trying to make it in professional sports on the same terms as men, and sometimes this clarity of intention gets in the way of the drama. An opening title card informs the viewer that since 1996 women have been allowed to play on professional baseball teams in South Korea with men. The card doesn’t say whether any women have actually made it that far, but the movie makes it appear that attitudes are much more difficult to change than rules. The titular protagonist is Joo Soo-in (Lee Joo-young), a pitcher for her high school team who is determined to make it to the big leagues. By the time we meet her, she is already a sullen figure, having been beaten back for her ambition after causing some excitement in the press years ago when she became the first girl to ever play on her high school varsity team in more than two decades. However, the acclaim is conditional, because her talents are only considered exceptional because she’s a girl, and she resents this characterization.

So when a scout for the pros comes to her school during the start of her senior year and chooses only one player for tryouts, she doubles down on that ambition and decides to work on her fastball so hard that no pro team will be able to reject her, at least not fairly. The team’s new coach, Jin-tae (Lee Joon-hyuk), himself a frustrated wannabe pro pitcher, is frank and cruel: She’ll never make it, not because she’s a girl but because she just isn’t good enough. Jin-tae’s get-over-it approach just works to make Soo-in’s determination that much more stubborn, and we get the usual training montages that end with her hands bleeding. Eventually, Jin-tae, recognizing how his own thwarted dreams are contaminating his judgment, advises Soo-in to develop a knuckleball, since she can’t hope to compete with stronger, larger pitchers with just a fastball. Meanwhile, that other cliche of the adolescent sports movie, the parent who berates her child into thinking more rationally about the future, is installed in the background. Soo-in’s mother (Yum Hye-ran) scolds her constantly, saying if she doesn’t soon choose a credible goal in life she’ll end up like her useless father (Song Young-kyu), who has wasted most of his life trying, and failing, to pass the national estate agent’s certification test. 

What Choi avoids, however, is more significant than what he includes. The movie is almost perversely low-key. Even when Soo-in achieves some measure of victory, the director pulls back so as not to place too much importance on it in the larger scheme of things. Part of this strategy is to keep the viewer wondering what Soo-in can possibly achieve in a world where everything is stacked against her, but it also makes the viewer appreciate the subtle bits of narrative that give meaning to Soo-in’s existence, like her relationship to Jeong-ho (Kwak Dong-yeon), the male teammate who was selected by the scout and who has been her best friend since they played together in Little League. Though there are hints of genuine affection between the two, Choi doesn’t do the obvious and make the relationship a potentially romantic one. If anything, these two souls, through what is portrayed as a very special rapport, seem to understand life better than anyone else in the movie, which is why it’s slightly disappointing that Choi doesn’t extend this sensitivity to the other female characters in the story. Soo-in’s mother never transcends her cinematic stereotype. Her best friend, a frustrated dancer, is simply on hand for dull contrast. Choi’s decision not to make a big deal of Soo-in’s gender while conveying the idea that it’s her distinct personality that makes her a good athlete is compelling, but he doesn’t quite do enough with it. In the end, the cliches win. 

In Korean. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Toho Cinemas Shibuya (050-6868-5002), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Baseball Girl home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2019 Korean Film Council

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Media Mix, Feb. 28, 2021

Family register

Here’s this week’s Media Mix about the Japanese government’s plan to digitize more public services. Japan remains relatively behind in this regard, despite its reputation for technological savvy, and it seems mainly due to the vertical organizational structures described in the article. Without greater connectivity across public and private organizations it will be difficult to make the changes necessary to digitize functions. As for the so-called cultural aspects, those are more difficult to figure out. Generally speaking, the Japanese public doesn’t trust the authorities when it comes to handling their private information, which is why the My Number system hasn’t progressed as quickly as expected. The Japan Federation of Bar Associations has acted as the de facto watchdog on government overreach when it comes to collecting citizens’ data, but the reluctance to digitize the family register, as pointed out in the column, is one of the more visible obstacles to the kind of bureaucratic overhaul the government has in mind, and as the official told the Tokyo Shimbun reporter, the resistance is rooted in historical and nationalistic considerations. The reporter points out that in Europe, it’s considered bad form to “inquire” into a person’s nationality because “ethnic fluidity” should be assured. In Japan, however, it’s still all about blood, which is why the family register, the document that defines a family, is so important, because it makes the government the arbiter of such matters. Japanese people must report their marriages and the births of their children to the authorities, and these events are not actualized until the authorities approve them by registering them in the koseki. Much has been made about the government’s opposition to allowing separate surnames for married couples, and the main reason that some couples object to this law is not so much because they want separate surnames but that they don’t want the government telling them what they can call themselves. A name, after all, is one’s most personal possession, and while in practice Japanese people can call themselves anything they want, legally they can’t. Something similar surrounds the concept of paternity. The government reserves the right to decide who is the father of a child depending on who reports the birth of that child for entry into the family register, and the status of the identified father of the child vis-a-vis the mother. The reason for this is simple. Mothers give birth, so maternity is easy to determine. But as for who the father is, discounting the modern use of genetic identifiers, it’s not as simple, so the authorities use the family register system and the Civil Code to determine paternity on their own terms, which also determines “legitimacy,” since a father who is not married to the mother is recorded differently. These are some of the cultural aspects of the family register that may make it difficult to digitize the system, since they depend on face-to-face encounters.

Posted in Media | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: Moving On

One of the more compelling aspects of the worldwide success of Parasite is that it wasn’t designed to be a worldwide success; or, at least, not in the same way that Bong Joon-ho’s previous movies, Snowpiercer and Okja, were meant to be worldwide successes. Parasite was about the way South Koreans live now, and much of the storyline would, theoretically, only make sense to South Koreans. That global audiences would pick up on these aspects, or, more relevantly, make an effort to understand the background and milieu of the story, proves not only the power of the story itself but also the true meaning of moviegoing. It’s not just about a willingness to read subtitles.

Like my favorite movie from last year, House of Hummingbird, Moving On was made by a first-time female Korean director and centers on an adolescent protagonist. I don’t know if Ok-joo’s experience in the movie is based on that of Yoon Dan-bi the same way that the teenage lead in Hummingbird was autobiographical, according to its director, Kim Bora, but there’s definitely a strong feeling of identification being projected onto the viewer, mainly in the way the script handles those fleeting moments of adolescence where matters seem extremely important for a little while and then seem much less so. But such uncommon sensitivity to universal feelings were less meaningful to me than those areas of mystery that kept me immersed in a story that was barely acknowledged. The film takes place over a brief summer break when Ok-joo (Choi Jung-woon), her younger brother, Dong-joo (Park Seung-joo), and their divorced father (Yang Heung-joo), moves house from Seoul to the suburb of Inchon, where the father grew up in a large house now occupied solely by Ok-joo’s pleasant but frail grandfather. We are meant to understand that Ok-joo’s father’s business has failed in some way, but since no time is given over to such concerns it may simply be that his business was never much to begin with. (One gets the feeling that the business had something to do with the divorce.)

But such prosaic concerns are not the movie’s. That concern is Ok-joo’s feelings as she starts a new life, and while Yoon doesn’t limit her POV to that of her young stand-in, it’s the one she obviously feels closest to. At first, the two kids predictably feel uncomfortable with being uprooted, and Yoon spends an inordinate amount of time following them as they explore their new world. Ok-joo quickly turns an unused room on the second floor, complete with old-fashioned sewing machine, into her own private realm and does her best to keep her pestering younger brother out of it. The movie is as loosely structured as the children’s daily exploits are free of responsibility, and then the father’s hard-drinking older sister (Park Hyun-young) moves in after having left her husband, a development that pleases Ok-joo, who longs for some kind of female presence. A family is thus forged, though Yoon is clear that this is a temporary situation, one that will likely only last the summer, and yet the house itself, a wonderful combination of fortunate location scouting and clever production design, provides enormous weight to the relationships on display, since so much of the family’s past history surrounds everything that happens in the movie. This house truly has character, and acts up in surprising ways; which is why the second half of the film is so subtly distressing. As Ok-joo goes about realizing her own needs by getting into trouble with the police (she tries selling her father’s athletic shoes on the street, perhaps unaware they’re knock-offs), contemplating cosmetic surgery, and trying to fall in love with a boy she meets, her grandfather’s health is quickly deteriorating, forcing her father and aunt to discuss selling the house and sending him off to a facility. Events move faster than they plan, however. Then Ok-joo’s estranged mother comes to visit, and hidden resentments bubble to the surface.

As in Hummingbird, the drama inherent in Moving On springs from a confluence of the universal (teenage angst) and the specific (Ok-joo’s material circumstances), which the director presents organically; and which means that the particulars of South Korean society, like the way the police handle kids or how filial obligations play out financially, are taken for granted. As an international movie fan you are obligated to reach these thematic understandings yourself, thus supplying half the joy you’ll derive from watching it. The rest is just wonder at how well Yoon puts it all together. 

In Korean. Now playing in Tokyo at Euro Space Shibuya (03-3461-0211).

Moving On home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2019 Onu Film

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: Stage Mother

Ever since her turn as the sadistically practical head of a ruthless crime family in the Australian movie Animal Kingdom, Jacki Weaver has cultivated an enviable career as the mother-for-any-occasion-and-accent. In a sense, she’s the easiest casting choice for the part of the richly imagined Maybelline Metcalf, a Texan Baptist who travels to San Francisco to attend to the disposal of her estranged gay son’s effects after he dies from a drug overdose on stage at the drag club he owns. Weaver has an uncanny ability to somehow transcend the worst traits written into her mother hen characters, and Maybelline, on paper, must have been a doozy. Though branded a comedy, Stage Mother is essentially a woke melodrama that veers fitfully into the ridiculous, and somehow Weaver never loses sight of the character or the movie’s guiding purpose of uplift, which, by now, feels outdated when addressing matters of parents acknowledging their children’s homosexuality, especially after they’ve died.

As the title so rudely points out, Maybelline quickly accepts the people her son worked and played with, including his partner, Nathan (Adrian Grenier), who reflexively pushes Maybelline away, convinced she’s a Republican banshee (she is, as a later scene involving an attempted rape and a gun prove), and his best friend, Sienna (Lucy Liu), a single mother with her own substance-abuse problems. Maybelline is so quick to take over the bar, which is failing financially, that Nathan doesn’t have time to file a restraining order and before you can say “T-bone steak” she’s jettisoned the establishment’s lip-syncing policy and is teaching the performers, which include a transitioning black man, how to sing in real harmony, just like her church choir at home. 

The name of the game is resourcefulness tempered with a bit of Texan hospitality if that hospitality weren’t informed by bigotry, which is why Maybelline’s husband back in Red Vine can’t abide his wife’s staying on any longer than she has to and she is free to strike up a flirtation with an ex-hippie-turned-5-star-hotel-concierge (Anthony Skordi), which is probably as good a metaphor for the unaffordable swamp San Francisco has turned into as anything, except that the filmmakers can’t quite grasp that irony and its implications. We’ve all seen this movie before and if it feels phony and over-determined in comparison to others of its ilk it has nothing to do with intentions, either Weaver’s or director Thom Fitzgerald’s. It’s because it doesn’t address reality outside the small world it attempts to elucidate. As melodramas go, it’s pretty limited. Any self-respecting drama queen would reject it on principle. 

Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Chanter Hibiya (050-6868-5001).

Stage Mother home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2019 Stage Mother LLC

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment