Review: Better Man and Piece by Piece

The biopic, especially those about musicians, was rendered a cliche when John C. Reilly cosplayed as a Johnny Cash-like character in Walk Hard, but that movie did nothing to slow the continuing onslaught of “based on true” recreations of the lives of pop stars, a parade of mostly mediocre films that all follow the same story arcs. Michael Gracey’s Better Man is, in theory, another attempt to poke fun at the formula, but not with overt humor. Gracey’s subject is the English singer Robbie Williams, who became a superstar as a member of the boy band Take That and was indirectly forced to go out on his own because of his offstage bad behavior. Gracey actually tells Williams’ story in the typical biopic fashion: kid from problem-addled background grows up rough but follows his dream of being an artist to the top before descending into drugs and poor decisions and then rising like a phoenix to even greater adulation and success. Gracey’s peculiar slant on this kind of story is to make Williams into an ape, in accordance with a conversation he once had with the singer who characterized his career as being that of a “dancing monkey.”

The best part of this conceit is that it’s played absolutely straight. Through excellently wrought CG, Williams (“acted” by Jonno Davies) looks like a real primate and even moves on occasion like one but never alludes to the fact that he’s different, physiologically or any other way, from all the humans around him. Consequently, the viewer is constantly under the impression that what’s happening on screen is not so much the objective truth as much as it is how the Williams “character,” who narrates the story, sees himself. Thus, during Williams’s childhood in a middle class family in Central England, his difficulties with school bullies and a father who eventually abandons his family to pursue his own dreams of show biz glory take on a special, almost bizarre poignance. Likewise, his own rise as a member of Take That and the cheeky way he asserts his unique talents in a group that is supposed to present a unified front has more power. At the same time, the appeal of the music and the group’s image is never taken for granted, and Gracey, who’s already proven his mettle in musical presentation with The Greatest Showman, knows how to stage a production number for maximum excitement, contrasting them with suitable drama after Williams launches a solo career whose highs are both sartorial and chemical, thus providing the story with ample justification for the requisite precipitous drop into notoriety and dashed romantic possibilities afforded by Williams’ relationship with Nicole Appleton of the girl group All Saints.  

If the movie eventually runs out of steam it’s mainly because the ape gimmick can’t keep the biopic formula freshly engaging for more than two hours. Halfway through I completely forgot I was watching a simian. The ending, where Williams seems to slay all his inner demons and find something approaching genuine satisfaction with life, felt merely cynical. Of course, that very well may have been intended, but for such an outcome to be effective at all it would have required a completely different approach to what I would describe as movie entertainment. 

Another musical superstar named Williams, Pharrell to be exact, wanted to do something similarly different with his biopic and, in a sense, his take is even more radical than Robbie’s. At the very beginning of Piece by Piece, Pharrell is seen chatting with the movie’s director, Morgan Neville, about his ideas for the project and Pharrell says he wants to do it as a Lego movie because his story is about “borrowing from what’s already there,” though the real reason seems to be that Pharrell is just a big Lego fan. The kicker is that he has already been introduced as a Lego figure by the time his idea is proposed.

As with Better Man, nothing changes once the gimmick has been put into action. The difference is that Robbie Williams as a monkey is something the audience has to get used to, but the Lego movie style is already very familiar. Previous Lego movies, which were mostly action-comedy fantasies that made fun of established franchises, have conditioned us to expect outrageous visual jokes about cultural touchstones, like the Batman movies. Pharrell tells his story as it happened and early on it becomes obvious that he isn’t using the Lego style to sharpen the irony or heighten any comic possibilities. As he said in the beginning, he just likes it. 

So the ups-and-downs typical of the musical biopic are played straight with the main difference being that Pharrell himself has always been pretty conventional as both a person and a professional. He indulged his childhood love of music without any adverse complications, having grown up in a loving, supportive family. He didn’t get into trouble or challenge authority. Along with his Neptunes producing partner, Chad Hugo, he realized his ambitions through hard work and talent, did not indulge in drugs or unwholesome behavior, and always treated mentors and collaborators with respect. This isn’t to say that Pharrell’s career is boring, but rather that the Lego style doesn’t really do much to render it in a more interesting way, except maybe to make Pharrell’s occasional spiritual pronouncements visually trippy. To me, the most enlightening element of the story is that Pharrell cemented his reputation by producing beats for the biggest names in hip-hop, including nominal gangstas, all of whom testify (in their own voices) that, as Jay-Z puts it, Pharrell “has absolutely no street” in his persona, even though he grew up in an African-American housing project. True to the name of the pop act he created with Hugo, N.E.R.D., he’s an otaku before he’s anything else. He just happens to be the richest one in the world. In that regard, making a biopic as a Lego movie is the ultimate vanity project.

Better Man now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), 109 Cinemas Premium Shinjuku (0570-060-109), Shinjuku Wald 9 (03-5369-4955), Shinjuku Piccadilly (050-6861-3011), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Piece by Piece opens April 4 in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Shibuya Parco White Cine Quinto (03-6712-7225). 

Better Man home page in Japanese

Piece by Piece home page in Japanese

Better Man photo (c) 2024 Better Man AU Pty Ltd.

Piece by Piece photo (c) 2024 Focus Features LLC/The LEGO Group

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Review: Mickey 17

Slapstick wasn’t always a feature of Bong Joon-ho’s cinematic style. It was first noticeable in a minor way in his sci-fi thriller, The Host (2006), and then central to his two English language fantasies, Snowpiercer and Okja. However, his comic sensibility was put to its most potent use in the Oscar-winning Parasite (those pizza boxes!), which is probably why Western viewers who weren’t familiar with his work before then now think of him as a satirist. His newest movie willl certainly reinforce this view, as its entertainment value is highly reliant on cruel humor to put across Bong’s acid opinion of where capitalism is taking us. Set in the near future on a private colonization expedition to a distant planet, Mickey 17 presents Chaplin’s hapless tramp in the form of failed franchise owner Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattinson), who is reduced to selling his body and soul for a chance to escape his creditors and achieve redemption—over and over again. Mickey has signed on to a rich religious cult leader’s space adventure as an “expendable,” a crew member offered up for sacrifice whenever there is a need for a disposable human body, and is then “reprinted” afterwards to do the thing all over again with the same memories and personality. He is literally and repeatedly worked to death, and, understandably, he’s sick of it.

As with Parasite, the offensive classisms are in the details. The cult leader, an unsuccessful Trumpian politician named Kenneth Marshall (Mark Ruffalo), is not only a blatant eugenicist but parades his childish arrogance like a peacock by serving his crew and followers the grossest food, treating everyone except his patrician wife, Ylfa (Toni Collette), with devastating condescension, and throwing deadly tantrums when his hare-brained schemes don’t go his way. After his 17th incarnation, Mickey is left for dead by his former business partner and straight man, Timo (Steven Yeun), on the surface of the cult’s new home planet after falling into an icy cavern, but Mickey manages to survive only to discover that in his impatience to get on with the project, Marshall has reprinted him again: Mickey 17 meet Mickey 18, who, for reasons that are not satisfactorily explained, is a psychopath to his predecessors’ meek punching bags. The fact that “multiples” are deemed an “abomination” by Marshall’s dogma means elimination of both Mickeys without the possibility of return, but 18 has already gotten it into his head that he was reincarnated for only one purpose: Payback for all the times he’d died. 

It’s a brilliant premise for which Bong can’t take full credit since the script is adapted from a book, but the director rigorously exercises his funny bone with numerous absurdist subplots involving Mickey’s on-board girlfriend, engineer Nasha (Naomi Ackie), whose libido is doubly stimulated by having access to two Mickeys; Ylfa’s plan to exploit the planet’s native marumushi fauna for her “sauce” fetish; a stowaway agent of Mickey’s and Timo’s loan shark who is on the hunt for the two scofflaws; and countless speculations on the uses of science and technology to profit materially at the gratuitous expense of those at the bottom. A little of this goes a long way and if it weren’t for Pattinson’s inventive and sympathetic portrayal of both Mickeys the breathless intrigues that Bong contrives might have outpaced me, but I was able to maintain my stamina until the end. For what it’s worth, Parasite did much better with basically the same themes and tools, but real imagination backed up by real ambition is never a waste of anybody’s time.

Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Marunouchi Piccadilly (050-6875-0075), 109 Cinemas Premium Shinjuku (0570-060-109), Shinjuku Wald 9 (03-5369-4955), Shinjuku Piccadilly (050-6861-3011), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024). 

Mickey 17 home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2025 Warner Bros. Ent.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Review: Emilia Pérez and Femme

At this late date, whatever interesting things Jacques Audiard’s unusual musical has to offer as entertainment have been subsumed by its attendant controversies. But even those interesting things are open to debate, mainly because they rely so heavily on idiosyncrasy for making an impression. The most obvious idiosyncrasy is the almost total lack of sympathetic characters, which shouldn’t necessarily be a handicap, but Emilia Pérez began as an opera, which means it relies on melodramatic devices for its emotional power, and without a countervailing indication of virtuous intentions the dramatic elements feel lopsided. One could argue that Rita (Zoe Saldaña), the lawyer who takes on the task of ushering the titular Mexican drug cartel boss through her sex change and then protecting her new identity as a woman, is the most relatable character in terms of basic human decency, but it requires a leap of faith that Audiard doesn’t justify.

Another idiosyncrasy is that many plot points are patently ridiculous, but only one is treated as such by the musical format, and that’s when Rita goes to Thailand to research sex change surgery options and is met with an elaborate production number featuring wheelchairs and humorous references to genital transformation. Most of the other musical interludes come across as almost serious, though it’s difficult to tell because they offer no memorable melodies or choreography that move the story along. Most are what you would call inner monologues cosplaying as songs. Saldaña is a fine dancer and Selena Gomez, who plays the cartel boss Manitas Del Monte’s Mexican-American wife Jessi, is a bona fide 21st century idol-pop star, so there’s no shortage of talent on display. Karla Sofía Gascón, who plays both Manitas and Emilia, has a roughness of presentation that enlivens both her acting and her singing, but the songs she’s been given don’t add anything to Emilia’s story as a journey of self-discovery. After all, the main purpose of her transition is not so much that she has always wanted to be a woman (though she says so many times) but rather that she wants to put the death and destruction that comes with her vocation behind her. After reemerging as Manitas’s previously unknown cousin, Emilia tries to make up for the misery caused by her former self by establishing a foundation to help the families of her victims reclaim their loved ones’ remains and find closure. But even Rita, who sold her soul to this devil in the first act, has to scoff at the perfidy of such an attempt at redemption, and Audiard engineers a punishment for Manitas/Emilia’s presumptions that is suitably operatic but no less ludicrous. 

In the end, the idiosyncrasy that neutralizes whatever inherent entertainment charms the material offers is the length. Operas and musicals are long because their production numbers require elliptical pauses in the action, but even the plot here feels as if it’s marching at a slower pace than necessary, which means it should have either been a straightforward telenovela without songs, or a ribald musical farce. At first, I concluded that Audiard brought too much to the table, but it’s probably the opposite: He didn’t think it through thoroughly enough. 

The protagonist of the British thriller Femme is not a transsexual, like Emilia Pérez, but rather a part-time transvestite. Jules (Nathan Stewart-Jarrett) turns into the glamorous lip-syncing queen Aphrodite on Saturday night, dolled up to the nines and strutting like a monument to outlandishness; and in private with his roommates admits that it’s difficult to tell which persona is the real him and which is an act. This fatal dichotomy becomes word when, still dressed in his stage gear, Jules goes out to buy some cigarettes and is accosted by a bunch of homophobic goons who beat the shit out of him. One of them he recognizes as a guy who’s been hanging outside the club giving him the eye, and following a period of traumatized healing when Jules retreats into himself, he hesitantly ventures out to a sauna where gay cruising takes place and stumbles upon his attacker, who doesn’t recognize him in mufti. Jules comes on to the guy, a drug dealing ex-con named Preston (George McKay), as a means of exacting revenge, though he doesn’t really know what form that revenge will take as he plays the subsequent affair by ear.

The directors, Sam H. Freeman and Ng Choon Ping, take this premise to its limit, both emotionally and dramatically. Preston’s greatest fear is that his mates will find out about his proclivity for homoerotic sex (Cultivated while in prison? That seems to be the implication), and his attitude toward Jules shifts constantly and often suddenly between violent paranoia and full-on obsession, while Jules, all the while plotting his reprisal, stews in his own fear and, against his better judgment, develops feelings for Preston that are only partly an expression of sympathy for his spiritual dilemma. When Preston takes Jules out on a date he brings him to an expensive restaurant where he tries to show off his epicurean side, which does nothing to counter his boorish self-image as a true lad but rather intensifies, in Jules’ mind, how completely at a loss he is in terms of self-esteem: All that showy macho bluster can’t hide the hatred he feels for himself. 

The story only magnifies the two characters’ slippery purchase on their respective identities even as it charges headlong into conventional thriller territory. If I found the denouement a bit too ambiguous, that’s probably because I, like too many habitual moviegoers, expect something more definite when confronted with certain genre elements, but you couldn’t accuse the filmmakers of being dishonest. 

Emilia Pérez, in Spanish and English, opens March 28 in Tokyo at Shinjuku Piccadilly (050-6861-3011), Marunouchi Piccadilly (050-6875-0075), Bunkamura Le Cinema Shibuya Miyashita (050-6875-5280), 109 Cinemas Premium Shinjuku (03-6709-6410), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Femme opens March 28 in Tokyo at Shinjuku Cinema Qualite (03-3352-5645), Human Trust Cinema Yurakucho (03-6259-8608), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551).

Emilia Pérez home page in Japanese

Femme home page in Japanese

Emilia Pérez photo (c) 2024 Page 114-Why Not Productions-Pathe Films-France 2 Cinema

Femme photo (c) British Broadcasting Corporation and Agile Femme Limited 2022

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Babygirl

It occurred to me while watching Halina Reijn’s extramarital transgression melodrama that it might not have worked as effectively as it does if an actor other than Nicole Kidman weren’t playing the main transgressor. With her reputation as a Hollywood superstar she injects a subtext of power into her character, a successful CEO who within the context of the story is considered a role model for female entrepreneurs. In the opening scene, she gets it on with her handsome, loving husband (played by Antonio Banderas, who was obviously chosen for his own extra-curricular baggage) in order to show that she doesn’t necessarily “have it all,” to use the cliche normally attached to women who enjoy both lucrative careers and solid marriages/families. Without Kidman to anchor this idea (Was it Steve Martin who made that joke about how Kidman is in every movie and TV show right now?) the film itself might have been received as little more than a kinky soap opera.

Kidman’s Romy is the founder of a robotics company who embarks on an affair with a young intern, Samuel (Harris Dickinson), who seems to have her number from the get go. Since we already understand that she fakes orgasms with her husband, we’re set up to intuit how Romy will respond to Samuel’s flirtations masked as genuflections to the differences in class and age that separate them. It’s these differences that Reijn wants to highlight, but the need to spice things up by making Samuel into an opportunistic predator often gets in the way of the social implications. If D.J. Lawrence did it more convincingly, it’s because the class distinctions between Lady Chatterley and Mellors were definitive. Reijn has to contend with the audience’s automatic repugnance of de facto class delineation. Like Mellors, Samuel asserts control through his use of the kind of sexual experience that Romy either doesn’t possess or has forgotten in her rush to the top of industry. Samuel is dominant, it’s implied, because Romy just can’t help herself once she’s gotten a taste. In that sense, the sex on screen is both liberating and highly stimulating, since Reijn and the actors serve it up straight. But in the end, the affair, and Romy’s desperate attempts to keep it under wraps, overwhelms everything else she does: It’s when the sex gets in the way of her work and leaves her exposed to blackmail, rather than interferes with her family life, that things start to fall apart.

Which is to say that social transgressions are more self-destructive than connubial ones. With or without Kidman, I could appreciate Reijn’s insistence that the kind of unfettered sex that Romy and Samuel partake of has no real bearing on the other aspects of their lives if left to their own devices, but that only means sex cannot be separated from one’s life in any way. Romy’s debasement in front of her so-called inferior, as exemplified by the title, is less of a thing than the notion that she is ruining all she’s worked for just to have a bit of nooky, which is not a particularly original idea, but one that Reijn puts across with a provocative freshness. 

Opens March 28 in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060) Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Shibuya Cine Quinto (03-3477-5905), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Babygirl home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Miss Gabler Rights LLC

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Three films by Alain Guiraudie

French novelist and filmmaker Alain Guiraudie has been active since the early 90s but didn’t really make an impression on the wider world until after the turn of the century, and even then his films were mainly categorized as Queer Cinema, a label that certainly applied but didn’t prevent his work from finding a bigger audience and winning Cesars and festival prizes. The fact that it has taken this long for any of his movies to earn theatrical releases in Japan is not necessarily surprising, but if this were the late 90s-early 00s, I’m sure he would have already become an item on the Japanese mini-theater circuit. Distribution of world-class art cinema isn’t as thorough as it used to be here. 

The oldest of the 3 features being released in Japan simultaneously this weekend, Stranger by the Lake, came out originally in 2013 and was the film that made Guiraudie famous internationally after it won the Queer Palm at Cannes and was chosen as the best film of 2013 by Cahiers du Cinema. Though I haven’t seen his previous work, which number a dozen shorts and features, from what I understand Stranger marked a shift in tone away from an aggressive form of confrontational cinema to something more conventional in presentation. Nevertheless, Stranger can still be startling in the way it tries to normalize behavior that many will find gratuitously unwholesome, and it’s not just because it’s set in an exclusively gay milieu, a remote lakeside cruising spot where anonymous, spontaneous sex is the only recreation on offer other than skinny dipping. Guiraudie delineates this aspect by dropping a straight character into the mix, a tubby, middle-aged guy named Henri (Patrick D’Assumçao) who shows up regularly at the beach just to watch what goes on. Our protagonist, a young buck named Franck (Pierre Deladonchamps), makes his acquaintance and the two often talk about life in general until Franck spies someone he likes and pursues him into the bushes. Guiraudie stages these trysts in such a way as to heighten their comical quality, but at one point Franck spies on a mustachioed hunk he’d like to shag who swims out to the middle of the lake with a companion and proceeds to drown the guy. Though he’s shocked, Franck’s ardor isn’t cooled a bit, and eventually he and the hunk, Michel (Christophe Paou), hook up as we in the audience wait for the other shoe to drop. The fact that the police finally show up and can’t penetrate the veil of homosexual solidarity—Franck’s too taken with Michel to rat him out, and thus his life seems even more at risk—heightens the suspense to almost unbearable levels. 

There are gay themes in Nobody’s Hero, released in 2021, but the main love story is hetero, even if it’s no less transgressive than the one in Stranger and a lot funnier. A freelance computer programmer of indeterminate age and no discernible charm named Médéric (Jean-Charles Clichet) approaches Isadora (Noémie Lvovsky), a middle-aged prostitute he’s been eyeing for a while, and propositions her for free sex, saying that he is “anti-prostitution.” Isadora initially blows him off but calls back later, intrigued by his gall, and they start to get it on in grand style in a rented hotel room when the TV reports a terrorist bombing in their city and Isadora’s burly, blunt husband barges in and drags his wife away. Guiraudie’s busy script lurches back-and-forth between this awkward and somewhat unappealing affair and Médéric’s parallel relationship with a homeless Arab teen, Selim (Ilies Kadri), who may have been involved in the bombing and is camping out in the hallways of Médéric’s apartment building. The two storylines eventually come together in classical farce style, sending up French attitudes toward minorities and the transience of sexual attraction. Not nearly as provocative as Stranger, Nobody’s Hero is nevertheless weirdly irresistible in its ability to take subjects that most people would consider controversial and treat them with a wry frivolousness.

Guiraudie’s most recent movie, Misericordia, isn’t as funny but still manages to keep you off balance with a story that never takes itself as seriously as it probably should. Jérémie (Felix Kysyl) drives to the rural village he grew up in to attend the funeral of his mentor, the village baker who schooled him in the art of pastries and baguettes. He boards with his mentor’s widow, Martine (Catherine Frot), who seems to be attracted to him, though it soon becomes clear that Jérémie always had a thing for her husband. Her son, the volatile Vincent (Jean-Baptiste Durand), is convinced that Jérémie has designs on his mother and pressures him to leave, thus making Jérémie even more determined to stay and manifest his real attraction toward a doughy old friend, the retired farmer Walter (David Ayala—one thing about Guiraudie’s objects of desire, they aren’t conventionally attractive), who quickly disabuses him of his availability. The real monkey wrench, however, is the elderly local priest (Jacques Develay), whose intentions toward Jérémie are anything but hidden, and when Jérémie becomes the prime suspect in a villager’s disappearance, it is the priest who comes to his rescue, so to speak, with an offer Jérémie can’t likely refuse. 

Some critics have called Giraudie’s films “Hitchcockian” in the way they toy with a viewer’s presumptions and primal feelings, but the most affecting aspect of his work isn’t the subversive humor or the weird way he ramps up tension. It’s how he confounds expectations about where his stories are going. His plots bob and weave tantalizingly, and often end up somewhere you would never predict after they make their own intentions clear. You may not appreciate them as much once you get to where they’re going, but you’ll have to admit they’ve taken you on quite a ride. 

All three movies, in French, now playing in Tokyo at Theater Image Forum Aoyama (03-5766-0114).

Home page in Japanese

Stranger by the Lake photo (c) 2013 Les Film du WorsoArte/France Cinema/M141 Productions/Films de Force Majeure

Nobody’s Hero photo (c) 2021 CG Cinema/Arte France Cinema/Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes Cinema/Umedia

Misericordia photo (c) 2024 CG Cinema/Scala Films/Arte France Cinema/Andergraun Films/Rosa Filmes

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Review: Starring Jerry as Himself

While watching this self-styled docudrama, one has to take into consideration that it is being directed by a professional filmmaker even if the protagonist-narrator, Jerry Hsu—playing himself, as the title so usefully points out—seems to be making all the decisions. So the home video quality of the production, which is a big part of its appeal, is something of a dodge, even as it sets the scene with a melancholy but believable premise. Jerry, who emigrated from Taiwan to the U.S. as a young man and now resides in a typical exurban town as a retired engineer, lives fairly comfortably on the money he saved. He is divorced from his wife, Kathy, who seems to enjoy a second life taking classes and hanging out with friends, and while in touch with his three grown sons doesn’t appear to be that close to them, even as the youngest is badgering him to loan him money for a down payment on a home. In other words, Jerry, the self-made immigrant, is pretty much an average American septuagenarian, healthy but lonely.

The drama starts when Jerry receives a call from two policemen in Shanghai who tell him that the Chinese authorities have determined criminals are using his bank account in the U.S. to launder money. The director, Law Chen, switches up the framing and the production values to show us the two policemen, played obviously by actors, talking to Jerry in Mandarin and explaining the situation to him, and thus the home movie takes on the cinematic trappings of a crime thriller. As Jerry, who is easily intrigued by the adventure potential of the police request, starts cooperating via cell phone with the officers to trap the criminals by staking out his own bank, which he is told is in on the scam, his sudden change in behavior piques the curiosity of his family, whose members have so far shown little interest in his activities or even well-being. But since Jerry has to keep a low profile, thinking the criminals may be somehow watching him, he can’t tell his sons what he’s doing. At one point, they conclude that maybe he has cancer and is dying, a plot development that gooses the story’s comic possibilities, though not as much as Jerry’s initial suspicion that Kathy might be working with the money launderers. 

Eventually, something’s gotta give, and when it does the movie loses its creakily charming mojo and turns into something more like an elaborate public service announcement. Admittedly, the entire family comes out of the ordeal closer and with a better appreciation of Jerry as a paternal figure, but it’s also obvious that Jerry the producer has contrived matters in such a way so as to convince the audience of all that. It would have been impossible for him to make a straight documentary about what happened to him in hindsight, but the methodology he ended up choosing feels deceptive. Only Jerry’s own natural likability saves the movie from being a total come-on. 

In Mandarin and English. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063).

Starring Jerry as Himself home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2023 Forces Unseen, LLC

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Review: Conclave

Though it only, and deservedly, received an Oscar for best adapted screenplay at the most recent Academy Awards ceremony, Edward Berger’s film version of Robert Harris’s bestseller, scripted by Peter Straughan, would have likely walked away with the lion’s share of statues had it come out, say, more than 30 years ago. This lush production about the Vatican’s College of Cardinals electing a new pope, featuring a stellar cast of well-known male actors, not to mention Isabella Rossellini, is what used to be known as a “prestige picture”: a movie on a serious subject presented seriously and in effortless good taste. However, it isn’t as self-consciously dull as some Oscar-winning prestige pictures (I’m looking at you, A Man for All Seasons), even if there’s a certain staid propriety in the mounting of the story that almost works against Harris’s pointed displays of transgressive mischief.

Ralph Fiennes plays to his peculiar strengths as Cardinal Lawrence, the dean of the congress whose job it is to manage the conclave, which suits him fine as he is currently struggling with a crisis of faith that makes the task at hand all the more usefully distracting. The main candidates are split cleanly along ideological lines between political progressives and social conservatives—the main villain of the story, Cardinal Tedesco (Sergio Castellitto), wants the Church to return to the Latin Mass. The initial favorite on the liberal side, the voluble American, Cardinal Bellini (Stanley Tucci), confides in Lawrence that he doesn’t want the gig at all (“it’s such a huge burden”), but feels he has to put up a fight to prevent Tedesco from prevailing, which would be a disaster, not only for the Church but for the world. In fact, during one of the ballots, St. Peter’s is attacked by a suicide bomber, causing Tedesco to double down on his pledge to publicly demonize Islam, a rather prescient threat, since an unexpected contender for the piscatory ring is Benitez (Carlos Diehz), the relatively young Spanish priest who was mysteriously elevated to the position of Cardinal of Kabul only a year earlier, and who, in the wake of several shocking revelations, including the intelligence that another front-runner, Cardinal Tremblay (John Lithgow), bought votes on order from the late Holy Father, becomes the spoiler that both Tedesco and Bellini—newly fired up with unbecoming ambition—have to beat. 

At times, Berger’s insistence on filling the story with as many cultural anachronisms as he can shake a miter at becomes oppressively busy, but the suspenseful touches are all the more appealing due to how carefully Harris has worked them into proceedings that are set in stone. This aspect provides pleasure in the opportunity to watch not only supposedly pious men grapple with impulses they’d prefer to hide from mere mortals (most notably one another), but also the spectacle of a hidebound institution entering a new millennium with all its bright red cassocks in panicked disarray. 

In English and Italian. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Chanter Hibiya (050-6868-5001), Kino Cinema Shinjuku (03-5315-0978), Shibuya Cine Quinto (03-3477-5905), Shibuya Parco White Cine Quinto (03-6712-7225), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024). 

Conclave home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Conclave Distribution, LLC

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Media watch: The roots of Nihon Hidankyo are not just in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but in Tokyo too

Daigo Fukuryu Maru

When the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations, better known as Nihon Hidankyo in Japan, won the Nobel Peace Prize last year, there were probably quite a few Japanese who were unfamiliar with the group, which represents survivors—hibakusha—of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Nobel committee gave Hidankyo the prize because of its work to rid the planet of nuclear weapons, a task that’s doubly difficult given that Japan, due to its security agreement with the U.S., is effectively under America’s so-called nuclear umbrella, and thus cannot do anything that would be seen to undermine the concept of nuclear deterrence. Consequently, the group doesn’t receive as much attention as it would like, since the Japanese media tends to align with government policy when it comes to matters of diplomacy and security. 

However, even we were surprised when we read in the March 2 edition of the Asahi Shimbun that the administrative roots of Hidankyo were not in either of the cities attacked with atomic weapons in August 1945, but rather in Suginami Ward, Tokyo. March 1 marked the  71st anniversary of the Daigo Fukuryu Maru Incident, when a Japanese tuna fishing boat was exposed to “death ash” from the U.S. test of a hydrogen bomb at the Bikini Atoll in the South Pacific. The incident was heavily covered by the Japanese press, and thus broke the national silence over nuclear weapons that had been imposed by the U.S. occupation after the war, which ended two years earlier in 1952. Petitions to end nuclear testing quickly circulated all over Japan, with some 32 million signatures collected, proving that the Japanese people knew exactly what happened at the end of World War II and were determined to make sure it would never happen to anyone ever again. 

According to Asahi, the origin of the anti-nuclear petition movement was the home of fishmonger Kenichi Sugawara in Suginami Ward. Sugawara’s daughter, Hideko Takeuchi, now 82, recalls how when her father heard of the Daigo Fukuryu Maru Incident, he despaired, not only about the fate of the irradiated fishermen, but also about his business and anyone else who sold fish in Japan. At the time, electrical refrigeration still was not widespread in Japan, and Sugawara kept his wares cool with a large wooden ice box, which meant he had to buy only as much fish in the morning at the Tsukiji fish market as he could sell in a day. It was literally a day-to-day operation: the money he made one day would be used to buy fish for the next day, but after the Bikini incident orders for fish almost completely stopped for him and other fishmongers throughout Japan out of fear of radiation. So they organized a petition drive to ban nuclear testing.

Continue reading
Posted in Media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Longlegs and The Sweet East

It says something about Oz Perkins’ distinctive contribution to the horror genre that his latest features Nicolas Cage in a supporting role as a serial killer who looks, sounds, and acts nothing like the Nicolas Cage we know and love. In fact, Perkins and the publicity crew at Neon have done a good job of keeping Cage’s character completely under wraps while admitting that he plays the titular devil worshipper, which of course makes the movie all the more irresistible. At this late date it’s not giving anything away to say the character really is something—horrifying and creepy in a unique way. Too bad the movie built around the character doesn’t take proper advantage of him.

Either an homage to or a ripoff of The Silence of the Lambs, Longlegs features another novice female FBI agent thrust into a case that’s been baffling the big boys. Unlike Jody Foster’s Clarice, however, Maika Monroe’s Lee Harker is not tasked with using her particular talents to glean insider dirt from an incarcerated serial killer to help catch one who is still at large. Instead, Harker herself seems to have been targeted by Longlegs, a person who somehow enters homes, either corporeally or spiritually, and then makes one member of the family slaughter all the others before offing themselves, leaving coded messages that Harker seems to be able to decipher. Her cynical but frustrated boss (Blair Underwood) isn’t really keen on letting this young’un have free rein over the case, but he’s under pressure to solve it after almost 30 years of zero leads, and Harker has already shown an ability to intuit killers in her vicinity. Perkins never uses the word “psychic” to describe Harker. It’s more like a sensitivity born of her upbringing in a pious Christian household with apocalyptic leanings. Whenever killers like Longlegs invoke Christian iconography and language, Harker can usually explain their motives and movements because she’s been there, so to speak. 

Though Perkins (who, by the way, is the son of Psycho star Anthony Perkins) knows how to maintain tension and create visuals that linger uncomfortably in the viewer’s psyche for days, he’s hung up on process, and as Longlegs’ identity and methodology are clarified he has to juggle several plotlines involving Harker’s mother and her boss’s own family in order to see the story through to its natural conclusion, which is more confounding than it is shocking. But it isn’t as startling as Longlegs himself, who, thanks to Cage, is a piece of work, and one you’re not likely to forget any time soon. 

Another aspect that Longlegs has in common with Silence is that it’s set in the 90s, though that’s not necessarily an important aspect. The Sweet East, the indie debut by veteran cinematographer Sean Price Williams, is set in the present, but for almost a half hour I thought it took place in the 70s. The production values, language, clothing, even the film stock felt like it was all trying to copy the laid-back immediacy of the early work of Altman and Ashby and their fondness for the picaresque, so it wasn’t until someone referenced Pizzagate that I realized it was lampooning our current sick society.

The requisite innocent is Lillian (Talia Ryder), a high school girl who is taking her first trip out of South Carolina with her Bible study group to Washington D.C. on a field trip. Adolescent energy eventually overwhelms any desire for edification, and Lillian decides to jump ship by joining a bunch of Antifa-anarchists who are planning a big violent protest. Not so much innocent as provoked by boredom, Lillian manages to escape the mess these clowns get into and then falls into the arms, so to speak, of the other side, specifically a white supremacist academic (Simon Rex) who educates her on the finer points of Nazi symbolism and the literature of Edgar Allen Poe. Though the seduction of nubile Lillian initially seems to be his scheme, the girl’s chronic “whatever” attitude seems to put him off and soon she’s being recruited off the streets of New York by two indie filmmakers (Ayo Edebiri, Jeremy O. Harris) who are making a movie about, of all things, the construction of the Erie Canal. Paired with a hunk actor (Jacob Elordi, the current definition of the term), Lillian is still unimpressed, but somehow parlays the part into minor celebrity status that also fails to impress her.

It’s difficult to determine exactly what Nick Pinkerton’s script is supposed to be saying, except that maybe some people are incorruptible because they just don’t give a shit, but the director has a great time making his set pieces look as presentable as possible on 16mm. This, after all, is the guy who shot such impossibly frantic indies as Good Time and Her Smell, and he manages to infuse a story that doesn’t know what it’s really about with a strong feeling of forward momentum. It goes nowhere fast. 

Longlegs now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Human Trust Cinema Yurakucho (03-6259-8608), Shinjuku Piccadilly (050-6861-3011), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

The Sweet East now playing in Tokyo at Human Trush Cinema Yurakucho (03-6259-8608), Shinjuku Musashinokan (03-3354-5670), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551).

Longlegs home page in Japanese

The Sweet East home page in Japanese

Longlegs photo (c) MMXXIII C2 Motion Picture Group, LLC

The Sweet East photo (c) 2023 The Sweet East Productions, LLC

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: Flow

As a film about four-legged creatures on a perilous long-distance sojourn, the Latvian film Flow, which recently won an Oscar, at first brings to mind the Disney classic The Incredible Journey, which used real trained animals as its protagonists. Flow is animated, and, as a friend suggested after I’d seen it, has more in common with the work of Hayao Miyazaki, whose affinity for nature the makers of Flow obviously share if not outright mimic. Though Miyazaki will occasionally include animals that act like people, for the most part he avoids anthropomorphizing his non-human characters, allowing them to express themselves in accordance with actions we would associate with their relative species. The hero of Flow is a housecat whose instinctive behavior is immediately familiar to anyone who has had one as a companion, a presentation that’s intensified by the fact that this nameless feline lives in an abandoned house in a forest surrounded by wooden and stone sculptures of cats, as if it were the muse of an artist who is now gone. And yet the cat returns to the empty house, as if waiting for its companion to return as well.

There are no people in Flow, which takes place after some kind of apocalypse. The land is suddenly inundated, and as the waters rise through the lush vegetation surrounding the house the cat survives as best it can, eventually encountering other animals—a lazy capybara, a mischievous, hoarding lemur, a goofy golden retriever, and a majestic Secretary bird—who form a kind of confederacy of the displaced, steering a broken sailboat among the ruins of civilization that are now mostly underwater. Though the theme that runs through the adventures these non-speaking comrades experience is one of communal dependence and cooperation, the cat is still the central consciousness, and director Gints Zilbalodis infuses the animal with a vivid personality that conflates a cat’s natural curiosity with a distinctive empathy. If humans, through their own selfishness, have destroyed this world, the surviving animals will keep themselves alive by looking out for one another, which may sound anthropomorphic (there are scenes, especially among the secretary bird’s own kind, that indicate non-humans can be selfish as well) but feels credible given what can only be described as the story’s focus on the longing for so-called creature comforts. 

That the characters are self-aware is perhaps the movie’s most striking assertion, since we tend to think of animals as being only present in the moment. Zilbalodis’s color palette and extraordinary use of light and 3D “camera” movement create a state of magic realism that respects these creatures’ inherent, organic being while giving them the opportunity to create their own stories apart from those we usually deign to impose on them, which is what Disney tends to do. Miyazaki uses animals to highlight and contrast his human characters’ relationship to nature. Zilbalodis attempts something similar, but leaves out the human presence. 

Opens March 14 in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Hibiys (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Flow home page in Japanese

photo (c) Dream Well Studio. Sacrebleu Productions & Take Five

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment