Review: Filmlovers!

At some point in a serious filmmaker’s career they tackle the subject of cinema itself. Usually, it’s in the form of a narrative love letter to the art, such as Truffaut’s Day For Night or Spielberg’s The Fabelmans, but sometimes a director goes the more direct route, and in many cases the resulting documentary is more circumscribed, like Scorsese’s film about Italian cinema. French director Arnaud Desplechin goes whole hog with Filmlovers!, that exclamation point lending full expression to his enthusiasm. Part narrated treatise, part re-creation of Desplechin’s own cinematic education, the movie sometimes reaches too far into the esoteric meaning of movies, and the English language narration by Mathieu Amalric can get a bit overwrought (“What happens to reality when it is projected on to the screen?!” he hisses through clenched teeth), but the enthusiasm is infectious and the concepts relatable. 

Amalric takes on the persona of Paul Dedalus, the character he played in Desplechin’s 1996 movie My Sex Life…, which was a gloss on Desplechin’s own life. Since the director himself shows up in the latter part of Filmlovers! to interview several people, the conceit seems hardly necessary, and the staged scenes of Dedalus/Desplechin’s evolution as a movie nerd aren’t always compelling dramatically. Much more interesting are the philosophical points that the dramatic scenes illustrate without always explaining, such as the involving nature of watching a film in a theater with an audience (“I was smaller than the images”). In a wonderful montage of average movie fans relating their most memorable experiences in a cinema, many cite horror movies or scenes that made them uncomfortable, and to his credit, Desplechin samples a wide range of films to prove his points, from well-known art house fare and experimental films to the most conventional Hollywood potboilers. He also sidetracks onto seemingly random tangents that nevertheless convey a sensitivity to what moves an audience elementally. In one section subtitled “Humiliated and Offended,” he explains how film is the most powerful artistic expression for “the underprivileged and children,” meaning viewers who can’t read (yet) and thus are denied entry to most narrative art forms. Movies help these individuals learn about the world and see themselves, often as victims of the powerful. From there Desplechin examines the Native American face in classic Westerns and extends the notion to a reverie on the late Native American actor Misty Upham. 

In the end, Desplechin’s real subject is truth and how cinema refracts and reflects it, which is probably why he includes an extended discussion, with the Israeli film critic Shoshana Felman, about Claude Lanzmann’s nine-and-a-half hour Holocaust documentary Shoah, a movie that places the past in the present by focusing exclusively on first-person accounts of death camp survivors who “witnessed the inconceivable.” Film, to quote Proust about a different idea, is a “search for lost time,” regardless of what the filmmaker purports to accomplish. Even fantasy is presented as something that must be made real in order for the viewer to be swept up in its made-up world. It might have been interesting to hear Desplechin’s opinions on our current obsession with streaming and portable screens (he does tackle television and seems to be for it), but maybe it would have impinged on the movie’s ecstatic mood.

In French and English. Opens Jan. 31 in Tokyo at Shinjuku Cinema Qualite (03-3352-5645), Human Trust Cinema Shibuya (03-5468-5551).

Filmlovers! home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 CG Cinema/Scala Films/Arte France Cinema/Hill Valle

Posted in Movies | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Hiroshima in context

This coming August will mark the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and at this point in time the ramifications of the act itself remain fairly circumscribed. People still argue as to whether it brought an end to the Pacific War and thus made wholesale slaughter of civilians during wartime an acceptable concept. At least 140,000 human beings died as a result of the bombing, some instantly, others after prolonged agony. There is, of course, something to be said about condemning the very idea of the bomb and its use against living things, given that many countries possess nuclear weapons and could conceivably use them under certain circumstances, but Hiroshima is part of history, something that cannot be undone. The impulse to lay blame or justify the bomb’s use cannot change what has already happened. It remains in memory as an epic tragedy.

But epic tragedies are stories, and stories are the most edifying tools we’ve got. That most people in the West were first made aware of the scope of the bombing with the publication of John Hersey’s book-long report in the New Yorker in 1946 counts as a significant part of the overall Hiroshima story. Hersey’s article did not explicitly contemplate the morality of the bomb or its role in ending the war, but conveyed its physical and psychological effects on six survivors. Readers had to decide for themselves the attendant morality based on what they knew about how the U.S. and Japan fought the Pacific War, and that knowledge may not have been extensive. The stories Hersey told after interviewing firsthand witnesses were harrowing and direct. He did not delve into the matter beyond what happened to the individuals he talked to and what they saw, but he made a huge difference by showing what the bomb did that made it unique as a weapon, and many readers were not only shocked by what he revealed but also disgusted by it, regardless of what it may or may not have accomplished with regard to Japan’s surrender.

M.G. Sheftall’s Hiroshima: The Last Witnesses doesn’t necessarily expand on Hersey’s report, and despite its subtitle, the book isn’t strictly an oral history, though much of the narrative portion is based on interviews with surviving hibakusha (persons exposed to the bomb). If anything, it’s an attempt to come to terms as thoroughly as possible with what actually happened on that day by extending the stories told by Sheftall’s interlocutors in both temporal directions and then adding relevant cultural and historical context. Sheftall, a longtime professor at Shizuoka University, keeps it all local. Except for the opening chapters, which describe in detail the execution of the bombing from the U.S. military’s standpoint, the nearly 500-page book is focused on the city of HIroshima, its residents, and, to a certain extent, Japan as a nation. In that regard, it’s almost a shame that the Nobel Peace Prize given last fall to the hibakusha organization Hidankyo wasn’t announced before the publication of the book, which mentions the group, and not just because the publisher could have used the PR to its advantage. The prize and its international press coverage provides meaning that gives the reader a wider understanding of the bombing’s, and thus the book’s, implications. 

Continue reading
Posted in Media | Tagged | 1 Comment

Review: The Goldfinger

Based on a true story, this thriller set in Hong Kong during the 70s and 80s stars Tony Leung and Andy Lau, together for the first time since the popular early-aughts Infernal Affairs trilogy, and was written and directed by Felix Chong, who wrote Infernal Affairs. However, the new movie has nothing much in common with the earlier project and comes off more as a gloss on Michael Mann’s Heat but set in the world of high-stakes finance. Leung plays engineer-businessman Henry Ching, who flees Singapore in the mid-70s when a housing scheme goes belly up. After failing to land a legitimate job amidst Hong Kong’s burgeoning real estate boom, Ching teams with budding developer KK (Simon Yam) to create a business empire based on stock fraud and market manipulation. Ching is good at it and eventually attracts the attention of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), which already has its hands full investigating routine police malfeasance. However, the chief investigator, Lau Kai-yuen (Lau), understands that Ching’s illegal activities have much bigger ramifications for average Hong Kongers who might invest in stocks, and, of course, the market crashes, ruining thousands while hardly touching Ching’s own worth.

Most of the thriller aspects spring from Lau’s frustration in getting anything on Ching. Every time he arrests someone or serves an indictment, Ching uses his business connections to either quash evidence or influence judges, many of whom are still attached to the British government, which wants Hong Kong to attract international business interests. Ching’s main means of staying solvent is borrowing money from shady Southeast Asian institutions, and not just private ones but also government-run as well. In fact, it’s often hinted that Ching himself is not really running the operation, but that it is somehow being stage-managed by a higher-plane Asian cabal. The movie covers some 15 years, during which inside players are detained, interrogated, and released without incident, only to be subsequently murdered when Ching and/or his betters decide they’re too dangerous to have around any more.

In theory, the movie shows promise in the vein of movies like The Wolf of Wall Street, but as a director Chong can’t maintain a straight storyline. He keeps moving backwards and forwards in time, the result being that there’s no accumulation of tension. We never get a clear feeling for the the Ching-Lau rivalry or the touted negative effects that Ching’s business is having on Hong Kong in general aside from the stock market. All we see is excess, as indicated in the misleading movie title. In addition, the CG is pretty cheesy and the acting showy without having any grounding in believable behavior. It’s quite a mess, which is baffling since The Goldfinger seems part of a recent trend to revisit pre-handover Hong Kong, a trend that has revitalized the local film industry (see Twilight of the Warriors), and is apparently one of the most expensive movies ever made in the territory. 

In Cantonese and English. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

The Goldfinger home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2023 Emperor Film Production Company Limited

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: The Apprentice

The Japanese distributor of Ali Abassi’s origin story of Donald Trump The Monster probably thinks they’ve scored a coup by releasing it the weekend before Trump’s second term as POTUS begins (it opened in the U.S. about a month before the election last fall), but I would argue that such timing is fraught. Obviously, releasing it after Trump reascends Olympus would be even dodgier, box office-wise, but at this point in the ever-expanding Trump news cycle the public, even non-Americans (especially non-Americans?), are already sick of the guy. It’s just as well that the movie comes across as a comedy, a kind of exploitation flick that’s as crass and crude as its protagonist. The difficulty is not that the truth about Trump’s subsequent success in the clear light of his perfidy makes all the jokes pointless, but that the man himself has no depths to plumb. It’s all there on the surface, which means the movie’s humor is stretched paper-thin from the get go.

The title, of course, does not refer to the reality show that revived Trump’s celebrity, but rather to his status vis-a-vis the ultra-aggressive lawyer Roy Cohn (Jeremy Strong), who in the 50s coordinated Sen. Joe McCarthy’s red-baiting escapades and sent the Rosenbergs to the electric chair, a feat that he, at one point, cites as his greatest achievement. (to paraphrase: “They said spare her, she’s a mother. I said, fry her, she’s a traitor.”) When they meet, Donald Trump (Sebastian Stan) is a relatively naive but ambitious real estate developer still under the thumb of his emotionally abusive slumlord father, Fred (Martin Donovan), going door-to-door to collect rent payments from struggling tenants. Donald enlists the blustery Cohn to quash a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Trump organization for housing discrimination. Cohn takes the challenge and effectively blackmails a DOJ official into settling the suit without any penalty. Recognizing that young Donald has the potential to be a shark just as lethal as he is, Cohn endeavors to groom the kid into the narcissistic bloviator we know and hate today, though the script by Gabriel Sherman focuses on two circumscribed time periods—the mid-70s, when Trump was just building his business empire, and the mid-80s when he was a qualified (all that debt!) success and Cohn had withdrawn from the picture because of AIDS—without giving much of a sense of how Trump developed in the meantime. Essentially, Cohn teaches him the ropes in the first half (Attack! Deny! Never admit defeat!) and we see him utilize those teachings in the second, though, in fact, as Trump himself confesses at one point, this ruthless, immoral attitude seems to have been part of his nature from the start. Along the way, Sherman and Stan drop all the cues that have come to define Trump, especially in his behavior toward his first wife, Ivana (Maria Bakalova), whom he starts to resent once she proves to be as effectively ambitious as he is; and his cruel dismissal of his loser older brother, who dies an alcoholic. 

That said, Stan’s performance is more than a good impersonation, and it’s easy to wonder how much better the movie could have been were the script as inventive and insightful as the actor. Strong is even better as Cohn, but only in the first half, poisonously combative and predatory, whether it’s in the courtroom or the bedroom. He tends to fall into Kendall Roy habits in the latter part of the film, when Cohn is weakened considerably by his illness. Too much of the dialogue is geared toward confirming what we already know about the two men and doesn’t really add anything useful, which isn’t to say Donald Trump is unknowable. If anything, he’s too knowable, which is the problem. As funny as the movie can be, in the end it’s just way too depressing. 

Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Kino Cinema Shinjuku (03-5315-0978).

The Apprentice home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Apprentic Productions Ontario Inc./Profile Productions 2 APS/Tailored Films Ltd.

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In

Though I don’t normally look to Hong Kong kung-fu epics for political meaning, I was puzzled by a central plot point in this 1980s-set action movie directed by Soi Cheang, which reportedly is the first of a series. Raymond Lam plays the main protagonist, Chan Lok-Kwan, who is described as a refugee in Hong Kong, and I kept wondering: A refugee from where? Since he speaks fluent Cantonese and has wicked fighting and mahjong skills, I assume he grew up either on the mainland or in a Chinese-speaking expat community in another country. Malaysia perhaps? Vietnam? The furiously paced plot has no real need to explain such things—though we do eventually learn that, as a baby, Chan, along with his mother, was “exiled” from Hong Kong—but there is something essential about the matter given that the historical thrust of the story eventually leads to the British handover of the territory to China in 1997, and so the historical background is important to the theme, if not necessarily vital for the action set pieces, which are numerous, densely choreographed, and viscerally mind-blowing.

Walled In is already being boosted as a full-on return to the great traditions of pre-millennial HK action, and in terms of plotting and character development, it may even surpass those traditions. Though Chan is a cliche, a poor migrant who is cheated by one triad and chased into the arms of a second, to which he then swears allegiance out of a sense of gratitude and fraternal belonging, there’s a richness to his development as a pauper-hero that’s mainly provided by the superior production values. The walled city of Kowloon—a real place—is so vividly tactile that overcoming its maze-like structure is an enormous feat, and the denizens of this demimonde are themselves vivid relics of a lost era in their own right. After escaping the clutches of the greedy triad boss Mr. Big (Sammo Hung), Chan is taken in by Cyclone (Louis Koo), the “head of security” for Kowloon, who protects its ragtag inhabitants for the main landlord (Richie Ren), a former triad honcho who lives off-site in palatial digs that are basically a shrine to the wife and daughter murdered by a rival triad boss (Aaron Kwon). His appetite for revenge is whetted by Chan’s “return” to Hong Kong, thus reigniting a new inter-gang war goosed by the ultimate prize: Title over Kowloon, whose properties are already skyrocketing in value following the announcement of the future handover.

None of this context adds anything to the excitement, but it does provide a thick dramatic texture to the action, which is designed to take up a maximum volume of space. More significantly, the supporting characters are carefully conceived as charismatic individuals and performed by a stellar cast, and I would venture that the only serious miscalculation was endowing Mr. Big’s sergeant-at-arms, King (Philip Ng), with supernatural powers that require an extra helping of ingenuity on the part of Chan and his newly adopted crew to defeat. If it sounds like a sop to the worldwide audience’s MCU proclivities, it seems hardly necessary. The abilities of these guys to take a licking and keep on ass-kicking transcend superhero formulas. The only question is: How do they possibly top this? Two sequels? Bring ’em on.

In Cantonese. Now playing in Tokyo at Shinjuku Wald 9 (03-5369-4955).

Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In home page in Japanese

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Review: A Normal Family

Probably no national cinema addresses the conflicts of social class with the directness of South Korea’s. There’s something almost perverse about Korean filmmakers’ willingness to expose the soul-destroying rot of the capitalist system on its citizens. Parasite is the most obvious example, but that’s more or less an allegory-fantasy, albeit an unusually insightful one. Hur Jin-ho’s adaptation of a Dutch bestseller locates its theme of irresponsible parenting in the specific trappings of Korean privilege, distilling a kind of horror movie effect in the process, not because of its occasional scenes of violence, either physical or emotional, but because of its ability to generate disgust. Maybe that makes it an allegory-fantasy too.

The family of the somewhat misleading title consists of two adult brothers, successful corporate lawyer Jae-won (Sol Kyung-gu) and successful pediatric surgeon Jae-gyu (Jang Dong-gun), who don’t really get along. Jae-won is the more materialistic of the two, a mild-mannered epicure who insists on expensive dinners once a month with his brother and their wives in order to present some semblance of fraternal harmony, though Jae-gyu, who prides himself on his service to humanity, finds his brother’s attitude toward life mercenary and cynical. After all, it is Jae-gyu, or, more exactly, his wife, Yeon-kyung (Kim Hee-ae), who is taking care of their senile and often violent mother while they look for a suitable nursing home for her. As the movie opens the two brothers are locked in a more immediate confrontation as Jae-won has been hired by one of his rich clients to defend the client’s wayward son, who has killed a man and sent the man’s daughter into a coma after a road rage incident. As it happens, Jae-gyu is the doctor who operated on the girl. But this confrontation becomes a sideshow to a more serious incident involving Jae-won’s high school senior daughter from his first marriage and Jae-gyu’s adolescent son, who, during one of their parents’ elaborate dinners, get drunk together at a party and later beat a homeless man almost to death. While the police look for the perpetrators, Yeon-kyung sees the CCTV video of the attack, which has gone viral, and recognizes her son and his cousin. All hell breaks loose between the siblings and their spouses as they decide whether to hand their kids over to the authorities or keep a lid on it. The ensuing indecision only exacerbates their desperation, and in the process the two brothers’ initial ethical distinctions start to shift.

This particular conundrum has been tackled by movies before. In fact, it’s been tackled by Korean movies quite a few times, the most potent example being Lee Chang-dong’s Poetry, in which an elderly, weak-minded woman is confronted with the crimes of her grandson, who she believes participated in the rape of a classmate. But whereas Lee’s depiction of this dilemma is centered on matters of conscience and empathy, Hur’s is stricly a class issue. Despite the fact that one of the brothers ends up doing what we would call “the right thing,” the audience still sees the people involved as being beholden to a hypocritical code of family unity that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. It’s a tragedy that’s been manufactured to evince significant schadenfreude in the viewer, who is invariably stoked to see all these entitled monsters—their children, especially—receive their comeuppance. Had it been handled as a comedy, I probably would have liked it a lot better.

In Korean. Opens Jan. 17 in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Chanter Hibiya (050-6868-5001), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Euro Space Shibuya (03-3461-0211).

A Normal Family home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Hive Media Corp. & Mindmark

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Review: Teki Cometh

With its monochromatic palette and focus on quotidian activity, Daihachi Yoshida’s Teki Cometh, which won the Grand Prix at the most recent Tokyo International Film Festival, initially offers a disarmingly unassuming approach to the notion of passing into insignificance upon reaching one’s dotage. The central figure, a retired 77-year-old French literature scholar named Watanabe (Kyozo Nagatsuka), whose wife has been dead for about a decade, lives by himself in a well-appointed, spacious old house in an unnamed city and goes about his daily tasks with the poise and determination of a man who knows exactly what he’s about. However, the audience, clued in by sound effects and odd visual cues, recognizes that something is amiss in the professor’s purchase on reality, and as the movie progresses he is subjected to an increasing onslaught of disturbing sensory phenomena that may or may not indicate he is descending into a form of madness.

Is it dementia? The imaginings take on many forms, from inferences of sexual interest from a former female student (Kumi Takiuchi) who often visits, to pure paranoia, suggested by conspiracy theories expounded on the internet, that he will soon be visited by hordes of filthy outsiders—the teki, or “enemy” of the title, whose florid English rendering makes fun of the professor’s academic pretensions. Based on a novel by Yasutaka Tsutsui published in 1998, when the author was 68, the movie exaggerates the protagonist’s self-diagnosed decrepitude. It’s like a study of the scourge of hypochondria intensified to comic proportions, which makes the jump scares less frightening than tragic. Watanabe is still publishing a regular column in what is characterized as a journal of no importance, and you can discern from his self-deprecating remarks that he knows it; and yet, when the publication drops him he’s deeply disappointed, as if this denial of his intellectual contribution is the beginning of the end, and his decline essentially starts at this point, even though no physical manifestation has kicked in yet. “The government doesn’t like people who live long,” says an acquaintance when Watanabe confesses that he’s not much for annual checkups, and it’s easy to get the feeling that the professor welcomes the end even though he fears it profoundly. As his mind begins to play tricks on him and the fantasies gradually take over, the subtext of past sins catching up with him (Did he cheat on his wife with a student?) is both stressed and subsumed by the outrageous hallucinations. 

As bold and startling as the visual production is, the pedestrian pacing and haunted house cliches undermine the raw power of the story, as if Yoshida were taking pains to keep the presentation respectful of his protagonist’s delicate sensibility. Watanabe’s desperation never truly registers because the blurring of reality and dream loses meaning for someone whose interior world is so purposely opaque. When everything falls apart it feels sad but inconsequential, like one of those essays Watanabe writes for the publication nobody reads. 

In Japanese. Opens Jan. 17 in Tokyo at Theatre Shinjuku (03-3352-1846), Euro Space Shibuya (03-3461-0211), Yebisu Garden Cinema (0570-783-715).

Teki Cometh home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2023 Tekinomikata/1998 Tsutsui Yasutaka, Shinchosha

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Media watch: Former justice minister gets firsthand look at prison life—as an inmate

In June 2021, Katsuyuki Kawai was sentenced to three years in prison and fined ¥1.3 million for violating the Fair Elections Law after a judge determined he had bought votes for his wife, Anri, when she was running in the 2019 upper house election in Hiroshima as a member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, a seat she won. At the time, Kawai, also an LDP member, was not only a sitting lawmaker himself, but the Minister of Justice, having been appointed to the post by then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Following the vote-buying allegations he resigned as justice minister, and in June 2020 was arrested along with his wife, who quit the Diet in February 2021. Katsuyuki quit two months later. 

On Nov. 29, 2023, Kawai was released on parole. He recently published a book about his time at Sakura Prison in Tochigi Prefecture, making the most of the fact that he is the first justice minister to ever be locked up. In recent weeks, he’s been making the media rounds to promote Prison Diary: The Justice Minister Who Went to Jail, and the coverage has not only been non-judgmental, it’s often been light and lively. A good example is his appearance on Abema TV’s “Abema Teki News Show,” which went as far as dramatizing several prison anecdotes described in the book. What was different, even refreshing, about the presentation is that Kawai seemed to have learned a lot about prison life that most politicians, including those interested in legal matters, would probably prefer not to have to talk about, and that such knowledge should be standard for the person who is essentially the highest ranking law enforcement official in the country, even if, practically speaking, most of the people appointed to that job aren’t really qualified to do anything except rubber stamp pronouncements from the bureaucracy or the ruling party’s leadership. 

Even Kawai’s overall assessment of the purpose of his imprisonment was startling, given that he was once a firebrand for the LDP and martyred himself for the sake of the party: It’s generally believed that the crime for which he was convicted amounted to following orders from his superiors, including Abe. At the beginning of his interview on Abema TV, he said that the facility where he was incarcerated is not referred to officially as a “prison,” but rather as a “center to promote rehabilitation,” a term that made him laugh since he received absolutely no instruction that could help him “reenter society.”

Most of the assigned work, for instance, was pointless in that no skills were transferred that might be useful on the outside. His first job was folding origami cranes (orizuru) for some private company, a task he never got the hang of. He was then sent to the prison library, where his main job was to inspect books donated for the prisoners’ use. Most were old and damaged, so he repaired them with glue and cellophane tape. He worked eight-hour days, Monday through Thursday. Friday was “instruction day,” when he was supposed to learn about the errors of his ways and how to be a good citizen, but most of it involved watching boilerplate videos, usually NHK programs. He then was told to write about the instruction as it applied to his own situation, an assignment that never made sense to him. Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays were free days during which he could do anything he wanted, but as he pointed out, most prisoners just slept because there were few options available and it was always cold, so instead of sitting around on the frigid floor (there were no chairs or beds) it was easier and more comfortable to just wrap up as best you could in the futon. 

Continue reading
Posted in Media | Tagged | Leave a comment

Review: Emmanuelle

Because Audrey Diwan directed Happening, a movie that honestly addressed abortion, it’s likely her remake of the 1974 softcore classic, which launched countless sequels and copies, will be described as a feminist take on the subject; but even if it was directed by a man it had its feminist defenders at the time, people who said that the title character owned her sexual agency and was therefore forward thinking. Having never seen the original I have nothing to add, but Diwan’s version is pretty boring, especially in the titillation department. (To be fair, it wasn’t her project. She was hired.) The sex is mostly of the imaginary kind, meaning Emmanuelle (Noemie Merlant) often fantasizes about it, thus conjuring up ideal sexual encounters to her own tastes. But much of the sensuality is submerged into the suggestive dialogue, which is in strained English even though Emmanuelle herself is French.

The setting is Hong Kong, more specifically a luxury hotel that Emmanulle is “inspecting” for the company that owns it. She occasionally checks in with the hotel’s manager (Naomi Watts), with whom she seems to have some kind of beef, probably because that’s her job, but the business talk effectively stops whatever passes for a plot dead in its tracks since the screenwriter, Rebecca Zlotowski, doesn’t betray much knowledge of the economics of running a hotel, especially one as self-consciously upscale as this one. She does manage to inject sexual innuendo into almost every conversation, though, including one about disaster management, and when champagne corks pop you get the idea of just how limited the filmmakers’ ideas are about conveying pleasure. Are they trying to intellectualize the original material, which, after all, started out as a novel? Or are they making fun of it? In any case, Emmanuelle seems to have the hots for one resident, a vaguely Japanese civil engineer named Kei (Will Sharpe), who picks up on her double entendres and treats them as philosophical puzzles rather than come-ons. 

In the end, Emmanuelle the movie is more about money than it is about sex, though I’m not sure that was the intention unless Diwan, after realizing what she’d gotten herself into, decided to sabotage the whole thing from the inside; meaning, it’s not a bad movie, only a pointless one. 

In English and French. Now playing in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063), Kino Cinema Shinjuku (03-5315-0978), Shibuya Cine Quinto (03-3477-5905), Toho Cinemas Nihonbashi (050-6868-5060), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024).

Emmanuelle home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Chantelouve-Rectangle Productions-Goodfellas-Pathe Films

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Review: Formed Police Unit

Sometimes the background of a movie is more interesting than the movie itself. This action blockbuster about a Chinese UN peacekeeping force sent to a wartorn African country had its shooting schedule extended about half a year after its star, Zhang Zhehan, caused a scandal when photos emerged on the internet of him visiting Japan’s Yasukuni Shrine, where Japan’s military dead, including Class A war criminals accused of atrocities in China during World War II, are enshrined. Moreover, another photo had him shaking hands with Dewi Sukarno, the Japanese widow of the Indonesian tyrant of the same name and a noted rightwing firebrand in Japan. Though there was some speculation that the photos were fabricated, Zhang didn’t do himself any favors by coming up with pretty lame excuses for their existence and has since been blackballed, and that meant all his scenes in FPU, as the movie is titled in Japan, had to be reshot. 

In any case, the film was picked up by a Japanese distributor, presumably because of its action pedigree, and on that front it has some crowd-pleasing elements, especially near the end when the gunplay, explosions, and mano-a-mano fist fights are ramped up to 10. Other elements are less enjoyable, in particular the script and the expository staging. The soldiers are policemen who’ve been selected to “form” the peacekeeping unit and then trained in warfare. This elite aspect translates as a jingoistic attitude that not only permeates the squad but imbues the plot with an unsubtle patronizing air toward anyone in the movie who isn’t Chinese. Supposedly based on a real PK mission in Sierra Leone that China participated in, the movie takes place in the fictional country of Santa Leonne, where a rebel leader, backed by evil white foreign mercenaries, is trying to overthrow the government, wiping out whole villages in the process. When the Chinese arrive they’re initially met with suspicion by the natives, but eventually they win their trust with excellent public service, a situation that’s conveyed through manipulative montages of FPU members putting up streetlamps and assisting in classroom lessons for children. When their activities run up against the stiff bureaucratic rules of the UN, they’re invariably scolded but in the end always end up on the right side of the argument, whether the situation is martial or not. The UN honchos are shitty negotiators and tactically inept, while the Chinese are disciplined and always act on moral principles.

There’s not a lot of nuance to the presentation. Subplots involving two young police recruits whose desire for real action gets them in trouble with their superiors and another recruit’s determination to live up to the example set by his policeman father, who was killed in action, are hackneyed and underdeveloped. But lack of nuance doesn’t hurt the violent set pieces, one of which takes place in a wild tropical storm that adds considerably to the visceral excitement. Suffice to say it could have been a lot better had the nationalistic prerogatives that had a hand in the film’s delay not been incorporated so forcefully into the screenplay, but what else would you expect from a Chinese blockbuster that touches on foreign policy? 

In Mandarin, English and French. Opens Jan. 10 in Tokyo at Toho Cinemas Hibiya (050-6868-5068), Toho Cinemas Roppongi Hills (050-6868-5024), Toho Cinemas Shinjuku (050-6868-5063).

Formed Police Unit home page in Japanese

photo (c) 2024 Zhongzhong (Huoerguosi) Films Co., Ltd. & Wanda Pictures (Huoerguosi) Co., Ltd.

Posted in Movies | Tagged | Leave a comment